Showing posts with label Wealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wealth. Show all posts

Monday, September 19, 2022

 Living Generously

Luke 16:1-13[1]

Generosity is something that I think just about everyone would agree is a good thing. We honor those people in our world who practice generosity. We even give them a special name: philanthropists. It’s a word that comes from two Greek words that literally mean “friend of humanity.” That may be assuming too much of every “philanthropist.” We tend to reserve that title for people who give large amounts of money. Like the owners of the Patagonia company, or Bill Gates. But people have all kinds of motives for giving money. For many, it’s a matter of making sure that others remember their name. We honor them as “generous” anyway, regardless of their motives.

That may give us a clue as to the real place of generosity in our society. I would say that true generosity, giving without receiving anything in return, is quite rare. Even among those of us who identify with the church, the data regarding giving demonstrate that true generosity is the exception rather than the rule. We shouldn’t be surprised at that. We live in a world based on competition that rewards winning, not giving. And our economy thrives based on how much people go out and get for themselves, not on how much people give to others. That’s the way this world works: as the saying goes, money “makes the world go around.”

In our gospel lesson for today, Jesus addresses this issue. As sages have observed for centuries, there really is “nothing new under the sun.” The drive to go out and get all that you can for yourself was just as powerful an influence on the people of Jesus’ day as it is in ours. In fact, even the Jewish religious leaders had embraced that way of living so much so that Luke calls them “lovers of money” (Lk 16:14). But Jesus addressed the question of wealth quite bluntly. He said, “You cannot serve God and wealth” (Lk 16:13). Translated into our terms, I think Jesus was saying that a way of life that is all about getting as much as you can for yourself is not compatible with a life of faith in God!

Jesus tells a rather confusing story to illustrate this point. The story is about the “manager” of a household who’d been caught “squandering” his master’s wealth. Because he hadn’t handled things rightly, he was going to be fired. But instead of preparing an “accounting” of his books, this “dishonest” manager abused his position to secure his own future. He did that by calling in those who owed the master, giving them back the original IOU, and having them write out another one with a reduced amount! Basically, he placed a lot of people in his debt by doing them huge favors. And when he came to “cash in” his favors, they would be compelled to welcome him as a guest in their homes.

It may seem strange that the master actually commended the steward for acting “shrewdly” (Lk 16:8). I don’t think the master was happy about what his manager had done. Rather, he recognized that the steward had come up with a clever plan. He took advantage of the fact that he still had the authority to manage the master’s wealth to make sure he would have a way to go on living comfortably after he was fired. That’s important for understanding this story. It’s a story about the way the world works, and I’m sure that many who heard it would have agreed with Jesus about that. People with wealth tend to use it to their own advantage, not to benefit others.

Jesus’ comments after the story can be confusing as well. He seems to commend “the children of this age,” like the dishonest manager, for being shrewder than “the children of light” (Lk 16:8). It seems like Jesus approved the way this manager approached wealth as a means of gaining eternal life! What we have to understand, however, is that Jesus is being ironical. The way this manager used wealth may have been “shrewd,” but it was “dishonest”: he used it for his own self-interest. His faith was not in God, but rather in the idea that his life consisted of the “abundance of possessions” (Lk 12:15), just like the “rich fool” Jesus spoke of. Like the man who tore down his barns to build bigger ones, this manager had was committed to serving wealth, and not God!

The key to understanding all of this is to recognize that Jesus was telling a story about the way the world works. For those who wish to align their lives with the kingdom God, the fundamental principle is very different: “Whoever is faithful in a very little is faithful also in much” (Lk 16:10). Those who would follow Jesus are to be “faithful” in the way they use their wealth. That means they are to give, “expecting nothing in return” (Lk 6:35). They are to offer hospitality precisely to those who cannot repay them: “the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind” (Lk 14:13). They are to live in a manner consistent with the generosity they have received from God by living generously themselves.

Jesus used this strange story about the way the world works to emphasize that it’s important for us to be diligent about how we use our wealth. But the “dishonest” way the manager used wealth for his own benefit is the opposite of what Jesus calls us to do. Instead of being selfish, we’re to use our wealth generously. Of course, perhaps one of the greatest obstacles to living generously in our time is the fear that someone will take advantage of us. In my experience, I think that’s guaranteed. But what others do is between them and God. We’re responsible for our own actions. As those whom Jesus has called to live for the sake of God’s kingdom, that means modeling the generosity we have received by living generously ourselves.



[1] ©2022 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm PhD on 9/18/2022 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE. For a video recording of this sermon, check out my Pastor Alan YouTube Channel: https://youtu.be/Bl_OOTyNQ3k

Monday, February 14, 2022

Tables Overturned

 Tables Overturned

Luke 6:17-26[1]

I think most of us approach life in a way that we are trying to make the best of it. We take care of our families, we work hard, we save for the future, and we do good in the community. It’s all part of what it means to “be a good person.” And we hope that “being a good person” will translate into having a good life. I think we tend to want our faith to fit in with our ideas about life in general. Believing in God, going to church, helping those in need are part of what it means to “be a good person.” And like the other areas of our lives, our practice of faith is a matter of doing the best we can to have a good life. It makes up what we believe constitutes the way life is supposed to work

With that in mind, I’m afraid that, if we’re truly paying attention, our gospel lesson for today may sound positively shocking. And I think it’s a normal response to find ourselves feeling uncomfortable with what Jesus says here. After all, he takes our “conventional wisdom” about the way life works and even what it means to have a good life and he turns it all upside down! More than that, what Jesus says here takes our beliefs about what it means to be a “good Christian” and turns them upside down as well. It can leave us feeling confused, because none of it seems to make sense with how we approach either life or faith.

Jesus’ beatitudes in Luke’s Gospel remind us faintly of the “usual” ones in Matthew, but they take a very different turn! Here Jesus says, “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh” (Lk 6:20-21)! And if that weren’t shocking enough, Jesus adds, “But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep” (Lk 6:24-25).

If you’re not stunned by those words, it may be due to the fact that they run so contrary to our understanding of the way life works that we simply cannot hear them properly. Here we have a very specific, very concrete statement about what it looks like when Jesus says, “the first shall be last and the last first.” Jesus came to announce the coming of God’s kingdom into this world, and in our lesson for today he was spelling out what that looks like in real life so that we couldn’t possibly miss it. The problem is that it probably leaves us feeling like the folks in the Temple after Jesus had come through and turned over all their tables.

That’s exactly what Jesus was doing in our lesson for today: turning all the tables over. And the impact of his words and deeds continues to overturn our view of the way life works. For one thing, we tend to think that what Jesus came to do was to bring us salvation, which is something spiritual. And we tend to assume that what is spiritual isn’t related to “real” life. But Jesus turns that notion over. As we saw in his sermon at Nazareth, he came to preach the “good news to the poor,” “release to the captives,” and freedom to those who are oppressed (Lk 4:18). The Kingdom of God isn’t about a spiritual reward in heaven one day, but rather it’s about changing the way this world works.

As we begin to better hear Jesus’ words to us today, we may think that the kinds of issues Jesus is addressing belong to “social justice.” That has become a label that in many cases refers to something we see as separate from the gospel and our faith. It’s a “special” kind of action, perhaps even something optional for those who feel compelled to pursue it. But on the contrary, Jesus called his disciples to follow him in the work of the kingdom of God. And part and parcel of that work was bringing “release” to all who suffer due to the way the world works now.[2] It’s what I would call the “justice of God’s kingdom.” God’s kingdom is about changing the way this world works to reflect God’s mercy, compassion, and love. If we would align our lives with Jesus, we must align our lives with the justice of his kingdom!

Of course, what makes this Scripture truly disturbing is the fact that Jesus talks about poverty and wealth. We tend to like our faith to leave our possessions alone. We believe that what we have is something that we have worked hard for and that therefore it’s ours to do with as we see fit. But Jesus says, “Blessed are you who are poor,” and “Woe to you who are rich”! It’s not that our wealth disqualifies us from participating in God’s kingdom, but rather if we would follow Jesus and align ourselves with God’s kingdom, then we cannot complacently assume what we have is ours to do with as we please. Rather, our wealth creates a responsibility for us to use our means to further God’s mercy and justice in this world.[3]

If you’re feeling a little uncomfortable with all this (or a lot!), I would say don’t be surprised. It’s hard for us to hear Jesus say these things. I’ll give you fair warning: we’ve just begun our journey through Luke’s gospel this year, and he’s not through with us! Some may even be worrying that I’m suggesting all the “rules” by which we’ve lived our lives have to change. I think that’s a fair question. And I would say that that is exactly what Jesus is doing: completely redefining the way the world “ought” to work. It may be hard for us to see because most of us benefit from it, but the way the world works now is not right in God’s sight. And Jesus made it clear that what God is doing is about more than just “saving souls”; God is working to set things right. So if we want to follow Jesus, instead of making our faith fit in with our ideas about life, we have to make our ideas about life fit in with our faith! And that means if we want to follow Jesus, who turned over lots of “tables,” we must align our lives with God’s purpose and join him in the work of making things right in this world.



[1] © 2022 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm, Ph. D. on 2/13/2022 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

[2] Cf. R. David Kaylor, Jesus the Prophet, 104: “Jesus addressed the poor, the hungry, the discouraged, and the persecuted with the message that God is on their side, supporting them in their struggle, and that God’s just will focuses on their relief. Because people opposed to God are currently in charge, God’s kingdom is not now fully present, and God’s will is not now being fully done. But it will not remain so.”

[3] Cf. Stephen Shoemaker, GodStories, 217–18: “There are only two ways you can enter the kingdom and experience its joy. One is to be among the poor, oppressed, bruised, blind, and brokenhearted; those to whom God comes as healing, comfort, justice, and freedom. The other way is to be among God’s people who are going to the poor, oppressed, bruised, blind, and brokenhearted and bringing God’s healing, comfort, justice, and freedom.”

Monday, October 11, 2021

Who in the World can be Saved?

 Who in the World Can Be Saved?

Mark 10:17-27[2]

Sometimes it seems like people either take salvation too seriously or too lightly. There are those who think that what it’s all about is securing your eternal destiny, and you just have to say the right words or go through the motions of the right rituals. As long as you get your “weekly dose” of God, you’re good to go. Then there are those who seem to think of salvation as an “impossible dream” or an “unreachable star.” No matter what they do, they seem to think that salvation is a goal that they can never attain. As with most things in life, I would say the truth lies somewhere between those two extremes.

If you’ve been following the last few weeks’ sermons, you may be wondering who could ever live up to the challenge of following Jesus in the life of the kingdom of God. Jesus has called us to “take up our cross” and “lose” our lives for his sake (Mk 8:34-35). If we want to follow him, we are to become “last of all and servant of all” (Mk 9:35). Jesus warns us in the strongest terms against causing others to stumble in faith or stumbling into sin ourselves. He has made it clear that following him means taking seriously our relationships. And this week, Jesus confronts the challenge that wealth poses to faith. We may well be wondering, “Who in the world can be saved?”

Our lesson from the Gospel of Mark is a familiar one: a wealthy man comes to Jesus and asks him “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus’ answer probably seems strange to us: “You know the commandments: ‘You shall not murder; You shall not commit adultery; You shall not steal; You shall not bear false witness; You shall not defraud; Honor your father and mother’” (Mk 10:19). Those of us with ears more attuned to St. Paul and who have “cut our teeth” on the Reformed version of the Christian faith would find it difficult to think that you “inherit eternal life” by keeping the “commandments.”

I think what we have to understand is that Jesus’ answer is framed in a particular way of viewing obedience to God. Everything Jesus says about obeying God has to be interpreted through the “two great commandments”: “you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart” and “You shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Deut 6:5; Lev 19:18). Of course, I’m not sure that makes things easier for us. I’ve always said that it’s much harder to love God and love others—truly—than to keep a list of rules that relate to our external behaviors. But the idea that we are called to love God and love others may help us make sense of Jesus’ answer. I believe his point is that when we do so, it will show up in the way we live our lives.

But that’s only part of the problem with our lesson for today. The other part is that this man responded to Jesus by saying “Teacher, I have kept all these since my youth” (Mk 10:20)! We might be tempted to think this guy was only fooling himself, but Mark’s Gospel tells us that “Jesus, looking at him, loved him” (Mk 10:21). I think this man was sincere in what he had asked and in his response to Jesus, and Jesus saw that. But we all have our “blind spots,” and unfortunately this man’s blind spot was the fact that he “owned much property” (Mk 10:22, NASB).

I don’t think it was an “accident” that Jesus told him to sell all he had and give the proceeds to the poor. You may have noticed that Jesus included the commandment “you shall not defraud” along with the others from the Ten Commandments. In the Bible, hoarding wealth at the expense of the poor constituted “defrauding” them. And the fact that this man owned “much property” directly violated Scripture. In that day, no land was to be permanently sold; every fifty years, in the “Jubilee” year, it was to return to the family that owned it originally. But in Jesus’ day, all the land was owned by wealthy people like this man. That meant that there were many families who had been “defrauded” of their property. This was the “blind spot” in this man’s profession of obedience to God.

We might think this was just a matter of this man’s relationship to his wealth. But Jesus goes on to say, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God” (Mk 10:25)! This seems to apply more broadly than just one man’s attachment to his property. Throughout the Gospels, Jesus makes it clear that wealth is a serious obstacle to “loving God with all your heart.” There’s something about our possessions that can “possess” us. If we aren’t careful, wealth has a way of taking over our heart and our life.[2] But selling all that we have and giving it away isn’t a very practical option for us. That’s why disciplines like hospitality, generosity, stewardship, and simplicity have always been part of the Christian life. The best way to ensure that your possessions don’t possess you is to give away enough of them that you notice it.

With all that we’ve heard from Jesus, our lesson for today might lead you to ask with Jesus’ disciples, “Then who in the world can be saved?” (Mk 10:26, NLT). I think it’s a natural response to Jesus’ deeply challenging statements about what it means to truly follow him. And we might really despair, wondering if anyone can ever live up to all that Jesus demands of us. But Jesus’ words to his disciples apply to us as well: “For mortals it is impossible, but not for God; for God all things are possible” (Mk 10:27). If we’re trying to “inherit” eternal life by our own efforts, we will always fall short. But as we seek—however imperfectly—to love God with all our hearts and love our neighbors as ourselves, we have the assurance that “for God all things are possible.” God can do surprising things in our lives and through our efforts.



[1] © 2021 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm, Ph. D. on 10/10/2021 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

[2] Cf. Joel Green, Theology of the Gospel of Luke, 148: “Wealth becomes a master if it is not mastered.”

Sunday, October 18, 2020

What Belongs to God

 

What Belongs to God

Matthew 22:15-22[1]

We have a saying: “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” Nobody likes to be played for a fool. When we find out that someone we may have trusted has actually deceived us, it sticks in our craw. Maybe for years, or even decades. And the worst is when somebody “sets us up” to play the fool. That can be just downright cruel. Unfortunately, we live in a world in which there are people who take a kind of perverse pleasure in showing others up in this way. I can’t say that I understand it, but it seems that those who feel inferior have a need to “prove” that they’re smarter or better than others in this way. I’d have to say that the times when I’ve been “played” like this have been some of the most unpleasant experiences of my life.

In our Gospel lesson for today, Jesus was being “played” by the Jewish leaders. There are several clues about this. First, the Pharisees and the Herodians were at the complete opposite ends of the spectrum in the Jewish world. “Herodians” were known as collaborators with the Romans. The only thing they had in common with the Pharisees was their desire to get rid of Jesus. Otherwise, these two groups would have seen each other as “enemies.” Second, the way in which they approached Jesus was clearly dishonest. No one but a disciple of Jesus would have said “we know that you teach the way of God truly!” The Pharisees and the Herodians certainly did not believe that!

So it probably didn’t take a great deal of supernatural insight for Jesus to see through their scam. It was pretty obvious that he was being set up. And I would imagine that the Jewish leaders were proud of themselves for coming up with this particular trap for Jesus. They assumed that whatever answer Jesus gave, he would lose. If he said that it was indeed lawful to pay the tax, he would have lost favor with the people. Taxation was the way in which empires like Rome paid for their conquests. They taxed the people they conquered. So you can imagine that paying this tax was something disgusting to the people.

On the other hand, if he suggested that they shouldn’t pay the tax, he would have given them grounds to denounce him to the Roman authorities. Not paying the tax was tantamount to rebellion, and the Romans were particularly effective at quashing even a hint of rebellion. When the Jewish people did launch a full-scale revolt some 30 years later, the Roman war machine ground them down so thoroughly that there was no Jewish nation until 2000 years later! For Jesus to advocate not paying tax would have meant a death penalty.

But they underestimated Jesus. They took him to be someone like themselves: hypocrites whose main concern was holding onto their power, prestige, and wealth. That’s part of the story here. Throughout this section of Matthew’s Gospel, the Jewish leaders repeated tried to set Jesus up for embarrassment or worse. The tension between the Jewish leaders and Jesus was running high, and they were looking for any way to get rid of him.

Jesus offers a simple solution to their question. He asks the Jewish leaders to show him the coin they used to pay the tax. It was a Roman Denarius. It was the standard wage given to a day laborer for one day’s work. The thing about coins in that day is that most kings, even “puppet” kings, minted coins with their image. The image on the Denarius would have been that of Caesar. The implication was that a coin ultimately belonged to the one whose image was on it. In fact, because Caesar’s image was on this coin, pious Pharisees would at least make a show of refusing to use it.

Since Caesar’s image was the one on the coin, Jesus made a simple suggestion: give back to Ceasar the coin that belongs to him. But he goes on to remind them that the God’s claim on our lives goes far beyond what you do with your money. The clear and consistent witness of Scripture is that God calls for us to love him with all our heart, our mind, and our strength. In effect, Jesus answered the question put to him by saying, pay Caesar his tax, but give your life to God!

I think Jesus was pointing them and us to a fundamental truth in Scripture. In one sense, everything belongs to God, including a coin with a man’s image on it. But God’s claim on our lives goes far beyond the money in our pockets. Not only all that we have, but also all that we are belongs to God: our families, our careers, our abilities, our hopes and wishes, and even the hours in our days. It all belongs to God. Jesus managed to take what was a “set up” meant to entrap him and turn it around to point his accusers to the basic truth they had forgotten in their hypocrisy: we’re meant to give back to God what belongs to him, and that means all of life!



[1] © 2020 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm, Ph. D. on 10/18/2020 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

Monday, September 30, 2019

Finding Lazarus


Finding Lazarus
Luke 16:19-31[1]
  There are many ways in this life for us to forfeit our humanity. We are so complex and vulnerable, and life can threaten us where we least expect it. I would have to say that our comfortable lifestyle encourages a complacency that can lead us to forfeit our humanity. It’s one of the most dangerous temptations of having all the “stuff” we have: it can leave us blind to the people in need and deaf to God’s call to help them. Being able to see a person living in poverty and hunger as a fellow human being is an important part of our humanity. So is being able to hear God’s call to put compassion and mercy into practice
  I think that’s why Jesus told this parable: to shock all who have become blind to the needy and deaf to the call to compassion. In fact, I would say that Jesus told this parable to address the fact that the religious leaders of his day were “lovers of money” (Luke 16:14). Their love affair with their own wealth blinded them to the real needs of the people around them. Not only did they love their money, they also “justified” themselves for it (cf. Lk. 16:15). They considered their wealth to be a sign of God’s favor. Unfortunately, the combination of their love of money and their self-justification robbed them of the ability to show compassion to fellow human beings.
  I believe this is the point of Jesus’ parable about a rich man and Lazarus. For those of us who have enough it can be so easy to ignore those who are in need. And when we do so, we lose a part of our humanity. What we have to understand about the rich man is that he is not only rich, he’s very rich. He wears clothing that only kings could afford. He eats all he wants of the finest and richest foods. And what is obvious from the parable is that Lazarus is not only poor, he’s completely destitute. He is so hungry he just wants the scraps from the rich man’s table. And he’s so weak that he can’t even fend off the starving dogs that gather around him!
  In the story, their situations are radically reversed. Both men die, and fate of the rich man, who was very likely a “pillar” of the community and a leader of the local synagogue, is shocking in the extreme. Instead of being rewarded in the afterlife, he finds himself in torment. On the other hand, Lazarus, who would have been despised as a “sinner” getting what he deserved, winds up in paradise, in the “bosom of Abraham.” I’m not sure we could imagine a more radical reversal of fortunes. It is a dramatic illustration of the first becoming last and the last becoming first.
  It seems to me, however, that one of the main points of this parable is the fact that this man who had incredible wealth ignored Lazarus, who suffered terribly right at the very gate to his household. I find myself wondering how many times the rich man ignored Lazarus. It’s hard to say. Did the rich man ever find himself in a position of actually stepping over Lazarus? I would say that’s very likely. Did the rich man ever once actually looked Lazarus in the eyes? I doubt it. The rich man had become so complacent with his wealth and his comfortable life that he could no longer even see Lazarus. And in the process, he lost a very important part of his own humanity: the capacity to show compassion to others. 
  After the dramatic reversal of the two men’s fortunes, the rich man begs Abraham to send Lazarus to his brothers, to warn them not to make the same mistake he had made. Abraham’s reply is simple and to the point: “They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them” (Lk. 16:29). The Scriptures have all the warning they need to learn what it means to put God’s mercy into practice toward others. But the rich man’s response is equally simple and blunt, “No, father Abraham” (Lk. 16:30). The rich man knew that they wouldn’t pay any more attention to Moses and the prophets than he had. And I think this is another of Jesus’ lessons in this parable. This man would have been respected by his community. And yet, in reality, his great wealth made him deaf to the clear and repeated call of the Scriptures to share what we have generously—especially with those who are poor, or hurting, or vulnerable, or in any kind of need.
  We still have Moses and the prophets, but I’m not sure we do any better job hearing them than the rich man or his brothers. We also have Jesus and the apostles, but I think it’s easy for us to ignore them as well. So what do we have, or perhaps better, whom do we have who can teach us to share what we have generously? We have Lazarus. In fact, we have many Lazaruses all around us. But the question we face is whether our humanity is still intact enough that they can help us. In the parable from our Gospel lesson, in spite of the fact that the rich man begged for Abraham to “send Lazarus” to help him, Abraham explained that he could not help. We might say that the rich man already had his chance to learn from Lazarus, and he ignored the lesson. But we still have a chance to learn from the Lazaruses of our world. 
  So how can the poor, the hurting, and those who have been cast out in our world teach us how to share ourselves generously?  They are our prophets and apostles because they teach us that the life that is truly worth living always has been and always will be characterized by compassion and generosity. Although Lazarus could not help the rich man who ignored his plight, I think perhaps he might help us. I think he can point us to the Lazaruses all around us, poor and oppressed and outcast people who represent opportunities for us to share our mercy and compassion. When we take the time to notice them and do something to help them, we have the chance to be converted to a life of sharing with those in need. When we “find Lazarus” in the least and the lost and the left out among us, we have the chance to recovery our own humanity.


[1] © Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 9/29/2019 at Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

Living Intentionally


Living Intentionally
Luke 16:1-13[1]
There is a lot of talk these days about living “intentionally.” Unfortunately, as is the case with other fads, the sheer amount of “talk” can render a topic like this to be virtually meaningless. It means everything, and it means nothing. But if you sift through all the noise, there is something to living intentionally. As I’ve observed before, we live in a culture that is designed to distract us. From our cars to our meals to our exercise habits to our fun, we seem to want to be constantly distracted. We don’t just “watch” a sporting event, we watch it, while we talk on the phone and comment on social media (and comment on others’ comments!). We seem to have lost the art of simply being in the moment.
I would venture to say that part of this love of distraction is that many of us simply are not “comfortable in our skin.” We’ve never really learned to just be who we are, and to be okay with that. The voice in our head that tells us that, no matter what we do, it’s never enough and it’s certainly never good enough defines our lives. With that kind of message constantly playing in the background of whatever we do, it’s no wonder we prefer the many distractions available to us. Until we can make peace with who we are, we will find it difficult to live intentionally.
Believe it or not, I think that our lesson from Luke’s Gospel for today is about just that: living intentionally. People have always found something to distract them from the somewhat challenging call to love God with all their hearts and love their neighbors sincerely. Jesus addresses the distraction that wealth poses, but that’s simply one of the more powerful distractions that we all face. For those who want to try to dodge the issue, Jesus speaks plainly: “You cannot serve God and wealth” (Luke 16:13). Translated into our terms, I think Jesus was saying that if you choose wealth as your master, it will take such a hold on your heart that you will not even be able to serve God!
Apparently, many of the religious leaders of his day had fallen into that trap. In order to address that problem, Jesus tells a rather confusing parable about the choice between living intentionally and being distracted. What makes this parable so confusing is that on the surface of things, it seems that Jesus is commending the dishonest use of wealth as a means of gaining eternal life! Given not only Jesus’ teaching about money, but the whole biblical witness, it’s clear that Jesus would not have made such bizarre statement. A little background might help us with the confusion. A “steward” was a household slave who was in charge of the master’s estate. He would manage all the affairs related to the operations, the personnel, and the finances. So the “steward” was the one who was entrusted with the master’s wealth.
This particular steward had been caught being dishonest, and it’s clear that the master was going to dismiss him. What the steward did next may seem shocking to us. He called in those who owed debts to the estate, gave them back the original IOU, and had them write out another one with a reduced debt. This might seem like outright theft. But it is likely that in fact the amount by which the steward reduced the debts was actually excessive interest that he had been charging (and probably pocketing). It would seem that in fact he was simply foregoing his dishonest “commission.”[2] 
We might wonder how this would do him any good. Again, some background might help. In that day and time, “debts” of honor were taken very seriously. With this plan, the steward was placing people in his debt by doing them huge favors. And when he came calling to “cash in” his favors, they would dishonor themselves in the eyes of the community if they did not welcome him as a guest in their homes. This explains the strange way the master commended the steward (Lk. 16:8). It seems confusing at first, but the master simply recognized the fact that the steward had come up with a very shrewd plan to avoid poverty when he was forced to leave his position.
It’s at this point that Jesus begins his confusing comments. He seems to commend the dishonest steward for being shrewder than Jesus’ own followers. He goes on to say, “make friends for yourselves by means of dishonest wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the eternal homes” (Lk. 16:9). Does Jesus want us to be dishonest and self-serving like the steward? I don’t believe so. While it sounds like Jesus was advising us to use money to gain some kind of eternal benefit, I don’t think that’s the point. I think Jesus wants us to be as shrewd about our discipleship as the steward was about his future. Jesus wants his disciples to live intentionally for the sake of God’s kingdom, and that includes how we use our wealth. [3]
It seems that the more prosperous we grow as a society, the more ways there are for us to distract ourselves from the calling to love God with all our hearts and to love others genuinely. I think that was one of the main reasons why Jesus consistently warned his disciples about the dangers of wealth. Of course, there are other ways we can distract ourselves from the challenge of living for God wholeheartedly. But I would say that wealth and prosperity underlie most of them. As St. Paul could say, “the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil” (1 Tim. 6:10). If we truly want to take seriously Jesus’ call to follow him by living intentionally for God’s kingdom, we will have to put money and all it can buy in its place.


[1] © 2019 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 9/22/2019 at Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.
[2]Cf. Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Gospel According to Luke X–XXIV, 1101; Darrell Bock, Luke 9:51–24:53, 1330, 1341.
[3] Cf. Jennifer E. Copeland, “Shrewd Investment,” The Christian Century (Sept. 7, 2004): 21, where she observes that the steward “used all the means at his disposal to adapt to his new reality. We should be no less shrewd in adapting to God's reality.”

Monday, September 09, 2019

Truly Rich


“Truly Rich”
Luke 12:13-21[1]
I think it’s fair to say that we as a people are obsessed with our possessions. We continually occupy ourselves with getting more—a better computer, a nicer TV, a newer phone, just to mention a few of the “hotter” items on the market. Experts recognize that this consumption of consumer goods is the engine that drives our economy. And this isn’t just about “the one who finishes with the most toys wins.” It’s ingrained into much of our decision-making. In a society where we seek to secure our future by our own efforts, we are constantly calculating ways of ensuring that our account balances are heading upward. And for us, that just makes good sense. It’s hard not to think that our lives consist in “the abundance of possessions.”
Part of this is simply a matter of living in a market economy. But there are many aspects of the way we live in this economy that betray the power of wealth over us. For example, many of us play the lottery. We see it as essentially “free money.” But we fail to recognize the bigger picture: “jackpots” are filled with money from people who buy lottery tickets. And many of them cannot afford to be spending their money that way. So those who “win” get rich at the expense of others. The fact that we rarely stop to consider this bigger picture betrays the way our wealth can influence us to neglect the welfare of others.
In part, that’s one of the reasons that Jesus criticized the rich farmer in our parable from Luke’s Gospel for today. Again, we might think his actions were prudent. Who wouldn’t store up a bumper crop in order to wait to sell for a better price in a lean year? We would see that as simply “good business sense.” But Jesus rather bluntly calls it “greed.” In our world, planning for the future is essential, because we are all aware that there will come a day when we can no longer provide for ourselves. But seeking to secure our own future this way implies that we believe our lives consist in “the abundance of possessions.”
That’s what the farmer in this parable believed. He says to himself, “Self, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry” (Luke 12:19). This might sound like a good thing. Who among us doesn’t want to be able to retire comfortably?[2] Who among us doesn’t worry at least a little about having “ample goods” to provide for our needs? Like the farmer in the parable, it would seem that many of us believe we can secure our own future through our wealth. And so we occupy ourselves, as he did, with storing up “ample goods” so that we can “relax, eat, drink, and be merry.”
In the parable, there is a background that plays a role here, but it may not be obvious. As in many of Jesus’ parables, the excessive wealth of some meant that others had to do without basic necessities. And one of the flaws in this farmer’s thinking is that he’s thinking all about himself, not about anybody else.[3] Although he has a bumper crop, he’s obviously wealthy enough that he doesn’t even have to sell his crop to cover his expenses. More than that, given his extensive landholdings, hoarding his crop will very likely adversely affect the food supply of the many others who are his neighbors. But he’s obviously not even thinking about the welfare of these “neighbors.”
The real problem with this outlook on life is that it neglects the dangers of wealth that Jesus so often warns against. Seeking an “abundance of possessions” has a way of turning into hoarding everything we can get our hands on. Finding our security in our wealth can lead us to ignore the source of our true security. It can motivate us to “store up treasures for ourselves” but to ignore what it means to be “rich toward God.” In other settings, Jesus explains that true riches are those that cannot wear out or disappear. Being truly rich comes from knowing God’s unconditional love for us, and sharing that love with those around us.
Although some of us may disagree, in the Bible our faith affects our attitude towards our possessions. When we encounter God’s love in Jesus Christ, it’s supposed to change the way we live our lives. And Jesus makes it abundantly clear throughout the Gospels that this extends to what we do with our possessions. As he pointed out so clearly, we cannot “serve God and wealth” (Luke 16:13). I think at least a part of what he was trying to say to us is that our wealth has a way of mastering us if we’re not wise in the way we use it. That’s why St. Paul warns us that we must “put to death … greed (which is idolatry)” (Col. 3:5). Wealth has a way of going from a simple means of exchange to a golden calf that we serve in place of God.
I think most of us would hear Jesus’ warning, “Be on your guard against all kinds of greed” (Luke 12:15) and think that applies to someone else, someone who is “really” rich. But in reality, it addresses us all with a choice as to which master we will serve. Choosing to serve “the abundance of our possessions” will rob us of the opportunity to be “truly rich.” When we become so consumed by our wealth that we ignore others, we are living in direct contradiction to the will of God. Being “truly rich” comes only as we find our lives in the new life that God offers us all.  It is a life of learning that becoming content with God’s love turns whatever we have into everything we could ever need. It is a life of loving God in return and therefore serving those around us in love—especially by sharing what we have with them.  Jesus calls this “being rich toward God” (Lk 12:21), or truly rich.


[1] ©2019 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 8/4/2019 at Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.
[2] R. Alan Culpepper, “The Gospel of Luke,” New Interpreters Bible IX: 257: “the rich man’s vision of the future sounds uncomfortably like one that most of us have for our retirement years. Are we really planning prudently? What gives our life meaning now, and what will give it meaning then?”
[3] Cf. Joel B. Green, The Gospel of Luke, 490-91.

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

All We Have


All We Have
Mark 12:38-44[1]
It’s not hard to see how much we as a people are preoccupied with our possessions. Especially at this time of the year. We’re already being bombarded by advertisements that seek to convince us that we don’t already have enough to be content. We need that newer TV, or that nicer car, or the latest and best electronic gadget. It’s the way our economy functions. It thrives when we go out and do our “due diligence” as consumers. That means spending money on more “stuff” at a rate that keeps the economy humming along nicely. We even have an index to measure this behavior: we call it “consumer confidence.” If we are “confident” consumers, we’re going to go out and spend our money on more things.
It seems to me that may be one of obvious ways in which our society fails to understand prosperity. Spending money becomes the measure of how well we’re doing. That we’re spending money on things we very likely don’t need doesn’t come into the picture. Nor does anyone stop to wonder whether all that spending is really a measure of our “confidence,” or a measure of our personal dissatisfaction with our lives. It seems to me that when we’re truly “confident,” we’re content with what we have, and we don’t need to go out and spend a lot of money on things we don’t need and may not even really want!
Our Gospel lesson for today throws the issue of wealth into the spotlight in a way that might seem rather uncomfortable. Jesus criticized some of the religious leaders who were so driven by their own conceit that they made an effort to look impressive with their beautiful robes and their “presence” in worship. He made it clear that it was all for show. He said that their “long prayers” were simply “for the sake of appearance” (Mk.12:40). In other words, they wanted to look like they were spiritual. But the fact that their real agenda was about themselves was revealed by the indictment Jesus made that they were defrauding some of the most vulnerable people in their society. It seems clear where their hearts really were—wrapped up in their own self-interest, their own image, and their own greed.
Jesus exposed the hypocrisy of the prominent people in the community as well. When he was at the Temple, watching the crowd making their contributions to that vast institution, it was apparent that there were “many rich people” who “put in large sums” (Mk. 12:41). He then contrasted the paltry contribution of a poor widow: she “put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny” (Mk. 12:42). But Jesus made the point clear: “all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on” (Mk. 12:44).
What may not be obvious on the surface of things is that the Greek phrase that is translated “all she had to live on” could also be rendered as “her whole life.” Perhaps she had reached the place where she had exhausted her own resources, and she was offering herself completely to God, trusting him to care for her needs. The irony is that, from Jesus’ perspective, her gift was more substantial than all the “large sums” the others gave. More than that, she embodied the kind of attitude that Jesus sought from all those who would follow him: that we surrender all that we are and all that we have to God.
The Scriptures and the Christian tradition are consistent on this matter: there is something about wealth that has a way of taking over your heart and life. Jesus said it this way: “you cannot serve God and wealth” (Matt. 6:24). Jesus knew what escapes us so easily: our possessions have a powerful way of “possessing” us. Throughout the ages the antidote to this problem has been to place all we have at the service of God’s kingdom. The traditional term for that attitude toward possessions is “hospitality.” It speaks of a level of generosity that is ready and willing to share all we have with those around us, especially those in need.
While there are lots of practical reasons for giving, I don’t think that’s what Jesus was most concerned about in this setting. It seems to me that he was more concerned with what wealth does to us. From that perspective, giving is a spiritual discipline that enables us to remain fully human in the midst of this world and its goods. Practicing generosity may be the only way for us manage to keep from losing ourselves in our possessions while we live in a world where we have so much wealth. If you wonder whether this may be a problem for you, Richard Foster offers a fairly simple test: select your most cherished possession, and then begin to look for an opportunity to give it away. If that’s doesn’t come easily, I think you’re in good company.
In our society, wealth is not only something we desire, it’s a necessity for retirement! If that’s not difficult enough, our consumer-driven economy makes it almost impossible to avoid the pitfalls of our affluence. If we’re honest I think we all have to admit that we can get quite attached to our “stuff.” And all of this can leave us quite blind to what our wealth does to us and our humanity. The discipline of giving is a means of reminding ourselves that that we are all dependent on God for all of life, just like the widow in our lesson. More than that, we practice the discipline of giving so that we can free ourselves from the fetters of our possessions. And we do that by surrendering all that we have to God.


[1] ©2018 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 11/11/2018 at Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

Wednesday, September 19, 2018

The Plumb Line


The Plumb Line
Amos 7:7-15[1]
As many of you know, I spent a year studying in Germany over 25 years ago. It was an amazing experience in many ways. The pace of life was much slower, by design. I lived there the year “the Wall” came down and East Germany along with the rest of Eastern Europe opened their borders. One of the interesting aspects of living abroad was getting accustomed to the housing arrangements. Some aspects of that experience were more “interesting” than others. If you’ve been abroad, you know what I’m talking about!
One of “weird” facts about the apartment we lived in is that the building was 400 years old! It was prime real estate, because it was right in the heart of the “pedestrian zone” of Tübingen. And yet, because the building was 400 years old, the corners weren’t quite square and the walls weren’t quite plumb. To be sure, the building had been renovated, probably more than once. It had all the necessary appliances and the décor was fairly modern. And I’m sure the walls were straight up and down when they were built. But after 400 years, those picture-postcard buildings in that quaint German University city were all leaning on each other! Four Centuries offers a lot of time for buildings to settle!
Amos, our prophet for this week, lived in a time when the commitment of the people of Israel to “doing justly, loving mercy, and walking humbly with your God” had had time to “settle.” Those who were at the top of the social ladder were living in relative prosperity. Unfortunately, as is so often the case, prosperity has a way of undermining spiritual and moral values. As Jesus said, “You cannot serve God and wealth” (Matt. 6:24). Amos could see by the conditions of the day that especially the leaders of Israel were more concerned about serving their own wealth than about serving God.
Unfortunately, that kind of obsession with wealth has a way of blinding us to our own spiritual poverty. The word of the Lord that Amos received was almost “sneaky,” in that he began by predicting the downfall of Israel’s enemies. One by one he declared God’s judgment on the nations surrounding Israel. And I can imagine that as he proclaimed his message of judgment on those around them, his audience nodded in approval. They were blind to the condition of their own spiritual house.
But Amos finally came back to the people of Israel. And he pronounced even stricter judgment on them because they should have known better: they were God’s people. And yet they failed to practice the most basic principle of God’s justice: to show compassion to the most vulnerable among them. This was the “plumb line” by which God measured their lives. But instead of practicing compassion, their mistreatment of the poor echoes like a refrain throughout the book of Amos. He said that they were “trampling on the needy, and bringing ruin to the poor of the land” (8:4). The corners of their spiritual house were not square, and the walls were not plumb.
In all of this, the prophet’s message of judgment was this: “You twist justice, making it a bitter pill for the oppressed. You treat the righteous like dirt” (5:7, NLT). And perhaps the most shameful aspect of their behavior was that it was all so that the powerful in Israel could further enrich themselves. It was all so that they could live in the lap of luxury: they built “houses of hewn stone” (5:11), feasted on couches made of ivory (6:4), and drank wine by the bowlfuls (6:6). And yet, because they had not followed the “plumb line” by caring for the most vulnerable, the walls of their spiritual “house” were leaning so badly they were on the verge of collapse.
I don’t think there is much debate about the fact that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer in our country. Income data over the last several decades makes it clear that a greater portion of wealth is concentrated in the hands of the very rich. And with some notable exceptions, they seem to be using their influence to continue to enrich themselves. In Amos’ day the solution was straightforward: “establish justice in the public square” (5:15). In our day, it may seem more complicated. But the plumb line remains: showing compassion to the most vulnerable in society. Jesus said it this way, “as you did it to one of the least of these, you did it to me” (Mt. 25:40).
When I was in Germany, I also witnessed the fall of the oppressive regime in Romania. In the aftermath, humanitarian aid came pouring in from all over Europe. And my church in Germany sent several of us with supplies to some churches. Along the way, I met with a missions supervisor in Vienna. He observed that the church in Eastern Europe had thrived under communism: the churches were bursting at the seams. But he said the church in Western Europe had languished under capitalism. I’m afraid that prosperity tends to have a deadening effect on our relationship with God.
The antidote has always been to serve the needy. We live in a time when the most vulnerable in our society seem to be getting poorer and needier every year. And, of course, the real question is how to find true and workable solutions to poverty. I don’t pretend to know the answer. But it seems to me that the walls of our spiritual house are leaning. It is a time when, perhaps more than ever, we must hold fast to the plumb line of God’s justice: showing compassion to the most vulnerable in our world.


[1] © 2018 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 7/15/2018 at Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

Tuesday, October 08, 2013

Blind and Deaf

Blind and Deaf
Lk. 16:19-31[1]
  It’s so easy to grow complacent in our world of abundance.  At least for those of us who are comfortable and satisfied.  By that, I mean those of us who have a roof over our heads and food on our tables, and we have no reason to worry about whether we will have those things next month or even next year.  One of the inevitable side-effects of that complacency is an unusual blindness.  We find ourselves less and less able to even see those who are struggling in our community.  Eventually we become so accustomed to overlooking them that they become invisible to us.  A related side-effect of our complacency is a kind of deafness.  As we settle into the comparative ease of our lives, it becomes harder and harder for us to even hear the call of the Scriptures not only to care about those who are hurting, but to do something about it.[2]
  I believe this is the point of Jesus’ parable about a rich man and Lazarus.   Those of us who have enough tend to become blind to those around us who are in need and deaf to the call of Scripture.  What we have to understand about the rich man is that he is not only rich, he’s very rich.  He wears clothing that only kings could afford.[3]  He eats all he wants of the finest and richest foods.  And what is obvious to those who have any shred of human compassion is that Lazarus is not only poor, he’s completely destitute.  He is so hungry he doesn’t even want the food from the rich man’s table, he just wants the scraps that fall on the floor.  And he’s apparently been in this condition for so long that his physical condition has severely deteriorated. He’s so weak that he can’t even fend off the dogs that are looking at him as if they are preparing for a meal!
  In the story, their situations are radically reversed.  Both men die, and fate of the rich man, who was very likely a “pillar” of the community and a leader of the local synagogue, is shocking in the extreme.  Instead of being rewarded in the afterlife, he finds himself in torment.  On the other hand, Lazarus, who would have been despised by anyone who actually noticed him because they would have assumed that he was a “sinner” getting what he deserved, winds up in paradise, in the “bosom of Abraham.”[4]  I’m not sure we could imagine a more radical reversal of fortunes.  It is a dramatic illustration of the first becoming last and the last becoming first.[5]
  I don’t really think that was the point of this particular parable, however.  It seems to me one of the main points is the fact that this man who had incredible wealth ignored Lazarus, a man who suffered terribly right at the very gate to his household.  How many times did the rich man ignore Lazarus?  It’s hard to say.  Did the rich man ever find himself in a position of actually stepping over Lazarus.  I would say that’s very likely.  Do you think the rich man ever once actually looked Lazarus in the eyes.  I don’t think so.  The rich man had become so complacent with his wealth and his comfortable life that he could no longer even see Lazarus.  What a travesty of the mercy and compassion of God that this rich man doubtlessly saw as the source of his good fortune. 
  After the drastic reversal of the two men’s fortunes, the rich man begs Abraham to send Lazarus to his brothers, to warn them not to make the same mistake he had made.  Abraham’s reply is simple and to the point: “They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them” (Lk. 16:29).  The Scriptures have all the warning they need to learn what it means to truly receive God’s mercy and to share it with others.  But the rich man’s response is equally simple and blunt, “No, father Abraham” (Lk. 16:30).  The rich man knew that they wouldn’t pay any more attention to Moses and the prophets than he had.  And I think this is another of Jesus’ lessons in this parable.  This man would have been respected by his community, even by the synagogue, since wealth was viewed as a blessing from God for one’s personal righteousness.  And yet, in reality, his great wealth made him deaf to the clear and repeated call of the Scriptures to share what we have generously.[6]  This is a call that is not just an occasional feature in the Scriptures.  This call is woven throughout the Scriptures.  Those of us who have experienced God’s mercy are called upon to show that mercy--in real ways--especially with those who were poor, or hurting, or resident immigrants, or in any kind of need.[7] 
  Most of us don’t think of ourselves as rich, and so it’s all too easy for us to turn a deaf ear to the call to share what we have with those around us who don’t have what they need.  Even though we don’t think of ourselves as rich, most of us enjoy a standard of living that is comfortable.  And our comfortable lifestyle encourages a complacency that makes it all too easy for us to a blind eye to those around us who are hurting.[8]  That’s one of the most dangerous temptations of having all the “stuff” we have: it makes us blind to the people in need and deaf to God’s call to help them. [9]  And yet, being able to see a person living in poverty and hunger as a fellow human being is a necessary part of our own humanity. When we lose that ability, we lose a part of ourselves.  Being able to hear God’s call to put compassion and mercy into practice is  necessary part of our spirituality.  When we lose that ability, we lose a part of our very soul.  I think that’s why Jesus told this parable--to shock all of us who have become blind to the needy and deaf to the call to compassion into opening our eyes and ears.  When we do, we recover our humanity, we regain our soul, and we find life.



[1] © 2013 Alan Brehm.  A sermon delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 9/29/2013 at First Presbyterian Church of Dickinson, TX.
[2] Cf. John Nolland, Luke 9:21–18:34, 833: “The parable suggests that there is a profound challenge to the social status quo to be found in the law and the prophets, and that there is a desperate need for the privileged to search out their stipulations and to act upon them.”  Cf. Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics 4.2.440, where he reminds us that even our “charitable” deeds can be infected with this blindness and deafness.  He says, “There is a form of love—mere charity—in which we do not love at all; in which we do not see or have in mind the other man to whom it is directed; in which we do not and will not notice his weal or woe; in which we merely imagine him as the object of the love which we have to exercise, and in this way master and use him. Our only desire is to practise [sic] and unfold our own love, to demonstrate it to him and to others and to God and above all to ourselves.”
[3] Cf. George W. Knight, "Luke 16:19-31: The Rich Man and Lazarus," Review and Expositor 94 (1997): 279, where he cites Josephus as describing this as the clothing of royalty (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 8.183; 11.256).
[4] Cf. Wade P. Huie, “The Poverty of Abundance,” Interpretation 22 (Oct 1968):404, where he observes, “Jesus certainly does not follow the line of the Pharisees who claim that wealth is God’s reward for righteousness and poverty is a sign of God’s judgment. ... Jesus does not find fault with one for being rich and the other for being poor.”  Cf. also Knight, “Luke 16:19-31,” 279.
[5] John Haughey, “There’s No ‘Them’ There,” Living Pulpit 13 (Oct-Dec 2004): 14.  Cf. also, Huie, “The Poverty of Abundance,” 406: On the surface Dives [the rich man] is a success, but beneath the surface he has rejected his ultimate responsibility: He has not loved his neighbor so he cannot be in love with God. The tragedy is not that he harmed Lazarus, but that he ignored him.”
[6] Mark Harris, “No Way Out” The Christian Century (September 12-19,2001):18.  He says, “The rich man doesn't get ... that he could not hear, or did not listen to, Moses and the prophets, who had a lot to say about justice, the poor and those in need.”
[7] Cf. Christine Pohl, “Building a Place for Hospitality,” in Christian Reflection: Hospitality (2007): 28, where she discusses the biblical commands to care for the resident aliens, the poor, and the needy under the heading of “Hospitality.”
[8] Huie, “The Poverty of Abundance,” 403 says it well: “Since I am not poor and do not feel rich, his words can easily hit me and bounce off.”
[9] Pohl, “Building a Place for Hospitality,” 33: “The church as a primary site for hospitality, and its important connection with the household, is overlooked. Rarely do we consider engaging in a kind of hospitality that helps people recover a place in the world and find healing within community.”