Tuesday, October 27, 2026

At the Head of the Line

At the Head of the Line

Matthew 21:23-32[1]

You probably know that I take airplane flights on a regular basis. With a son in Washington, DC, a son who now lives near New Haven, CT, and a daughter in Houston, it makes sense for me to fly to see them rather than drive. But I can’t say I enjoy flying. One of the things I dislike most is the lines. Because I fly so much, several years ago I paid for TSA “pre” status. At the time, I did it because it meant I didn’t have to take off my shoes and my belt and unpack “half” of my carry-on bag in order to get through security. That doesn’t include keeping track of my phone, my wallet, and anything else in my pockets. I think you may be getting the idea that I found it stressful. I know things have gotten easier for everyone with airport security, but I still like the shorter line!

I’ve tended to fly Southwest Airlines. I liked the fact that they had open seating. Of course, that meant you had to check in exactly 24 hours before your flight if you wanted any chance of getting a good seat. How early you checked in determined how early you got to board the plane. You would be assigned a letter and a number to determine your boarding group and your place in line. That meant “lining up” to get on the plane was fairly simple. You found your place in line based on your number. Now they’ve done away with all that. You choose your seat ahead of time just like any other airline, and you just have a boarding “group.” So these days, everyone seems more anxious about being at the front of their boarding group. We may all have assigned seats, but there’s still the problem of snagging space for your carry-on bag in the overhead bin. Everybody wants to be at the head of the line when it comes to getting on the airplane.

There are other aspects of life where we want to be at the head of the line. It should come as no surprise that this can be a part of some people’s religion. Most religions have some kind of “hierarchy” by which some are treated as more “worthy” than others. That was very much the case in Jesus’ day, as we learn from many of the stories in the Gospels. As in our lesson for today, Jesus often clashed with the Jewish religious leaders. They controlled the Temple and the Synagogues, which means that they controlled who was considered “righteous” and who was branded a “sinner.” But Jesus saved his strongest criticisms for the religious leaders. Much of what he said suggests that they weren’t even very good people, let alone worthy of the “honors” they claimed for themselves. In fact, on many occasions he called them “hypocrites,” people who were only putting on a show of devotion to God.

In our lesson for today, Jesus tells a parable to illustrate the point. In the parable, a father asks his son to go work in the vineyard and he refuses, but then changes his mind and goes. The father asks his second son to go to work and he says yes, but then doesn’t go. The clear implication is that it’s not always those who make a show of being righteous who actually practice what they preach. In fact, Jesus told the religious authorities point blank that “the tax collectors and the prostitutes” were actually “going into the kingdom of God” ahead of them (Matt 21:31)! In those days, “tax collectors and sinners” were the “worst of the worst” of the sinners. And Jesus was addressing people who thought they were the “best of the best” of the righteous. They most certainly believed they were at the head of the line!

In fact, however, the authorities had already betrayed their false character. When they asked Jesus about the source of his authority, they were clearly not being sincere. Jesus exposed that by asking them about John’s authority to baptize. In the process, it became all too obvious that they were anxious to conceal their true opinion from the crowds. They were more worried about maintaining their power and prestige than practicing a way of life that actually followed the will of God, a way of life that Jesus called “the way of righteousness” (Matt. 21:32). It would seem that the so-called “righteous” people weren’t so righteous after all.

The truth is that the whole system of their religion at that time was an elaborate justification for their self-righteousness. Unfortunately, that can still be the case. “Leaders” who are often deceitful and malicious get to designate themselves as “righteous,” whereas people who may be guilty of nothing more than being poor or destitute are designated as “sinners.” But designating them as sinners only gives the “righteous” a convenient way to avoid facing their sins. Scapegoating the people they look down on only enables them to keep up their sham religion. This kind of behavior is not exclusive to the self-righteous in Jesus’ day. Religious leaders throughout the ages have exercised a great deal of control over people by their power to determine who gets branded “sinners” and who gets to be “righteous.” And religious people of all levels have used that power to justify themselves. But whenever we use our religion to make ourselves look good at the expense of others, we’re really only deceiving ourselves. We label them “sinners” just so that we can avoid facing our own hypocrisy.

Our gospel lesson confronts us with the hard truth that our religious devotion can turn into something harmful. It’s another reason why many people don’t go to church these days. We turn our religion into a competition where the only way “I” get to be at the head of the line is by making sure “you” are at the end of the line. It can all too easily turn into a way of simply making ourselves look good. It’s as if people have always viewed the prospect of “heaven” as a competition. And like any other competition, what matters is getting to the head of the line and staying there. It doesn’t matter how we get there, just that we’re “first” and not “last.” But Jesus said that kind of hypocrisy will not do in God’s sight. There’s no room in God’s kingdom for making yourself look good at the expense of someone else.

More than that, Jesus pointed out that those whom we often label “sinners” can be way ahead of the so-called “righteous” people when it comes to actually practicing the compassion and kindness that defines the way God wants us to live. After all, Jesus did say that he came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance (Matt 9:13). More than that, he said there will always be more rejoicing in heaven over one “sinner” who repents and returns to God than over 99 so-called righteous people who think they “need no repentance” (Lk 15:7). The kind of people Jesus was looking for to follow him were those who would truly and sincerely follow his way of living. That meant actually practicing his teachings, which he said amounted to “doing to others what you would want them to do to you” (Matt 7:12, NIRV). As it turns out, none of the “show” that self-righteous people put on to make it look like they’re godly counts for anything. What counts is what St. Paul called “faith working through love” (Gal 5:6).



[1] © 2026 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm PhD on 9/27/2026 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

Upside Down

 Upside Down

Matthew 20:1-16[1]

Many of us grew up in a time and a place where pretty much everybody around us was just like us. For the most part, anyway. The connections we have available to us not only through traditional media, but also through the internet and social media, have literally brought the world into the palm of our hands. We can easily see how the different peoples around the world live very different lives from us in many ways. Sometimes, the way people live their lives can feel so different to us that it can seem like they’re “flying upside down” in comparison to the way we live. I think about people who live nearby who belong to the Amish community. They have embraced some of the technology that the rest of us use, with strict boundaries around them. But the typical image of a horse-drawn carriage on a busy road with a line of cars behind it reminds us of how differently they live. It can seem like they’re “flying upside down.”

I would say that the kingdom of God that Jesus preached and taught is something very different from the way most people live their lives. The priorities Jesus chose and the principles on which he based his life have made it seem to many like Jesus was “flying upside down.” Think about it: Jesus said if someone strikes you on one side of your face, turn the other side for them to strike as well. That’s just not the way people behave! And, of course, there’s the whole thing about Jesus literally giving up his life for us all on the cross so that we could know and enjoy God’s love for us! When push comes to shove, most of us will choose ourselves and our families over anybody and everybody else. Jesus’ way of life seems very strange to us indeed!

Our lesson from Matthew’s Gospel for today is an example of this. Jesus tells a parable about a man who owns a vineyard. The harvest is ready and he’s anxious to get the grapes out of the field. So he goes to town at the break of day to hire day laborers. Then he keeps going back all day long, sending more workers to help with the harvest. Even when the day is almost over, he hires those who likely showed up quite “late” for work. When it comes time to pay the workers, things take a surprising turn. The owner instructs that the workers be paid beginning with the last to be hired—and he pays them all the same thing! Those who worked only one hour got a full day’s wage, just like those who put in a full day’s work!

When those who had worked all day complain, the employer simply insists that he has a right to be generous with what belongs to him. I think a big part of what this parable is about is that in the kingdom of God, we are all “eleventh-hour workers,” regardless of what we may have done. That’s because we all receive far more than we deserve. In God’s kingdom, grace and mercy and love define life for all people, and all benefit equally. That also means that in God’s kingdom, there’s nothing to earn. Everything is based on the truth that God is generous! And so, in God’s kingdom, as Desmond Tutu puts it, “There is nothing we can do to make God love us more” and “there is nothing we can do to make God love us less.”[2]

  On one level, this comes to us as unbelievably good news. But on another level, I’m sure it makes us more than a little uncomfortable. When the first are last and the last are first, it upends our expectations that life will follow a predictable pattern. We want to get what we think we deserve! We’re used to those who work the hardest getting paid the most. By contrast, in the Kingdom of God, those who are deemed godless gain entry ahead of those who are supposedly righteous. Little children, who were definitely the “least” in those days, are the example by which we all must measure ourselves, not those who are the most accomplished and the most successful. Those who serve are viewed as the “greatest,” and those who seem to be “great” are in fact viewed as “least.” And the “last” are “first” and the “first” are “last.” For those of us who may have worked hard all our lives to “get ahead,” this may not sound like good news at all! It may seem to be all backwards. It likely feels like Jesus was turning everything upside down!

But then maybe that’s part of what this parable is meant to address: we’re comfortable with a world in which the first are first and the last are last. Giving everyone the same grace, mercy and love regardless of what they do sounds “unfair” to us. So does the idea that everyone receives God’s blessing equally, regardless of how hard they work. We’re much more comfortable with the idea that you get what you deserve. But the point of the parable is that in God’s kingdom we all get far more than we deserve. In God’s kingdom, we all enjoy God’s grace, mercy and love freely and equally. The Bible reminds us that this applies to all of life. We cannot claim anything we have as a “reward” for our labor, because, as the Bible reminds us, it all ultimately comes from God.

When we really listen to what Jesus said in his parables, it may very well seem to us that he was “flying upside down.” But I would submit to you that Jesus was describing life as it was meant to be. It’s the rest of the world, including maybe some of us here today, who are flying “upside down.” Jesus came to try to help us learn to turn our planes around and fly right-side up! That reminds me of the Amish and their approach toward technology. The boundaries they observe are meant to ensure that what they have doesn’t diminish their family or their community. Now there’s a novel idea!

One of the things I learned about flying upside down in preparation for today is that most airplanes aren’t designed to be flown upside down. The curve of the wing, the structure of the plane, and even the way the fuel pumps run are designed for flying right-side up. So a pilot has to work harder to fly upside down. To those who are used to the way life works in this world, much of what Jesus taught must seem “upside down.” The more we get serious about following Jesus, the more clearly we see that those who are trying to get ahead according to the ways of this world are the ones who are actually “flying upside down.” When we begin the path of discipleship, it may feel like we’re having to work harder. It takes more effort to swim against the stream than to just go along with the way things are. But the more we practice following Jesus, the more natural it will become for us to do things the way he did: extending grace, mercy, and love to everyone equally, regardless of what we think they may or may not deserve!



[1] © 2026 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm PhD on 9/20/2026 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

[2] Desmond Tutu, God Has a Dream: A Vision of Hope for Our Time, 32

Harmony

 Harmony

Romans 13:8-10; 14:1-19[1]

We human beings tend to believe that our viewpoint on a particular subject is the “right” one. At least if you’re like me! We may not admit it out loud, because that would be embarrassing. We may even make a show of deferring to others when they disagree with us. But we still tend to believe that we’re right and anyone who disagrees with us is “wrong.” That kind of “all-or-nothing,” cut-and-dried, “black-or-white” thinking doesn’t leave much room for tolerance. I dare say that if someone surveyed this group of people gathered in this place for worship on this morning, there would likely be a variety of opinions about all kinds of subjects. The reality is that’s just as true when it comes to our faith and how we practice it as it is with our other opinions. But when we gather in this place, I hope we try to focus on what unites us rather than what divides us. I think that’s what Jesus would want from those who seek to follow him.

Our lesson from the book of Romans for today addresses this question. I also hope you were able to hear that the earliest Christians disagreed on some fairly important matters. Our lesson from Romans for today isn’t the only evidence of that. There are other passages in the New Testament that show the early Christians disagreed on some fairly important matters. In our lesson for today, Paul mentions two specific points of disagreement: which day to hold worship and whether or not to eat meat. The conflict in both situations arose from the difference between Christians with a Jewish background and those with a background outside of Judaism. And in that day, the vast majority of churches included both groups. So these questions were very much “live” for them. And they provoked serious disagreements among the early Christian communities!

The matter of which day on which to worship was not a new problem in the Greco-Roman world. Jewish people living in that world faced serious opposition because they insisted on keeping the “Sabbath” day holy by not working. In the Ancient world, every day was a day for work. There was no such thing as a “day off” or a “weekend.” And more than that, Jewish Christians would have been accustomed to worshipping on Saturday, their “sabbath” day. Gentile Christians, on the other hand, may have been more likely to worship on Sunday, in honor of the fact that Jesus rose from the dead on the first day of the week. This was no trivial matter to either group! But Paul urged the believers of his day on both sides of the issue to accept each other’s differences. In fact, for Paul, it didn’t matter which day of the week you chose for worship! That may still be shocking for us to hear!

The other issue had to do with eating meat. I’ve mentioned before that meat was sold in open-air markets. And a significant amount of the meat sold in the market was left over from sacrifices that were offered at pagan temples that morning. But there was no “stamp” to indicate which was which. You couldn’t tell which had been offered to a pagan god and which was simply slaughtered for sale that morning. For some, to eat meat in that context could be construed as taking part, at least in an indirect way, in the worship of false gods, which was a violation of the most important of all commandments! There were some believers, probably those who came out of a pagan background, whose Christian faith was too “weak” to get past that obstacle. As a result, they chose to eat only vegetables as a way of honoring. There were others, probably those who came from a Jewish background that denied any reality to pagan gods, whose faith was “strong” enough to recognize that all things come from God, and so they ate meat, and they did so giving thanks to God to honor him as well. Again, the question here wasn’t about food. It was about the worship of false gods! And on a matter this important, Paul urged tolerance! Again, that may seem shocking!

We might wonder how St. Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ could make such apparently offensive compromises. Does it really not matter on which day of the week you worship? Does it really not matter whether you eat something that others find offensive because they see it as taking part in the worship of false gods? I think that least part of the answer to these questions is that Paul realized they were matters of interpretation, subject to differing opinions, and therefore not essential to faith. He didn’t want the Body of Christ divided over matters of opinion. Rather, he urged that believers adopt the mindset that we all “belong to the Lord” (Rom 14:8), even and especially when we disagree about significant issues! This was so important to Paul that he asked them who they thought they were to condemn other believers who answer to Jesus Christ as their “master” first and foremost (Rom 14:4)![2] More than that, he urged that they accept each other, regardless of their differences, so that they could “aim for harmony” above all things (Rom 14:19).

Of course, the real question is how far we take this kind of tolerance. Differences of opinion on matters of religion have not only divided the world into different denominations, they have also fueled all-out wars. To be sure, there’ve been conferences throughout the ages to resolve these differences and find a way toward tolerance. But even with the “agreements” that have been reached on matters of religion, differences of opinion on matters of faith have continue to provoke lynchings and witch hunts and all kinds of ongoing violence through the ages. To some extent, you could say that religion has always fueled conflict. Or perhaps it would be better to say that religion has always been used as a means of fueling conflict by those who have coopted it for their own purposes.

But I would say this is a matter of “the tail wagging the dog.” When people use religion for their own purposes, things usually get out of whack. And sadly, the typical strategy is to pick out matters where there ought to be legitimate room for a difference of opinion to drive a wedge between people who otherwise could get along with one another. You may find this hard to believe, but one of the most controversial points of disagreement in the Christian church over the centuries has been over how we understand what happens when we celebrate the sacrament of the Lord’s Supper. Talk about the tail wagging the dog! What ought to bring us together as one has been one of the greatest sources of division in the Body of Christ for centuries!

In the early days of the Protestant Reformation there was disagreement among the “reformers” that threatened to splinter the movement. There was a conference between Martin Luther and his counterparts from the Calvinist branch of the church to try to settle their disagreements. Although they agreed on most of the matters they faced, they disagreed on the Lord’s Supper. Specifically, the one aspect of the Lord’s Supper about which they disagreed was whether the communion bread actually became the body of Christ! They had the chance to agree to disagree, but some of them wouldn’t have it, and it didn’t happen. And it still divides Christians to this day.

About a hundred years later, years that were full of religious wars in Europe, a principle emerged that has been quoted by many who chose harmony over discord: “In essentials unity, in non-essentials liberty, in all things charity.”[3] “In essentials unity.” We practice that by affirming the Apostles’ Creed. “In nonessentials, liberty.” That’s where we have different practices. “In all things, charity.” Of course, in that day, “charity” was what we call “love.” Of course, in these and other religious disputes, the “rub” relates to what you define as “essential” and “non-essential.” We can always find ways to draw dividing lines in these matters. But there’s no questioning the importance of that last phrase: “in all things charity.” It seems to me that if we get that part right, then maybe the lines we draw between what we think is “essential” and “nonessential” might not be so important any longer.

I would say Paul teaches us to make “charity,” or love, the overriding principle in every dispute. Paul speaks of it earlier in our reading for today: what we “owe” to each other is the same love that God has given us. We will likely never agree on what is essential and what is negotiable in matters of faith. But surely we can agree that the foundation for harmony in the church is that we observe the commandment, “you shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Paul said when our religion is real, it will show up in our love for one another. When I think about this, I wonder how many lives could have been spared over the centuries if people of faith had practiced “charity” in all things. And I wonder, in these days when we seem to be so divided and so willing to condemn those who disagree with us, how much conflict and grief may be spared if we who claim to follow Jesus would practice “charity” above all else. I wonder what it will take for us to seek harmony above all things!

I don’t know that I have the answer to that question. What will it take in these days for us to practice charity above all else? In these days, what will it take for us to seek harmony above all else? I know for myself, what helps me is to be reminded that God has accepted me as I am. God’s love for me never fails. God chose to love me from “before the foundation of the world” as Paul says. And that love will never fail, “world without end, Amen! Amen!” That helps me to get past any differences of opinion and to see other people who may be across the “lines” as persons for whom Christ died, whom God loves. They are human beings who deserve my full love and respect, simply because they’re human beings. I don’t know what it will take for you to get there. That’s why I’ve left my sermon “open-ended” today. I hope we will go from this place and explore that question. I hope that we may indeed learn to practice “charity” above all things and seek harmony above all else. And in the process, maybe we can make a real difference in our world!



[1] © 2026 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by Rev. Alan Brehm PhD on 9/13/2026 for Hickman Presbyterian Church, Hickman, NE.

[2] Cf. Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics 2.2:725: Christians holding different opinions cannot judge each other “Because both are servants, each serving the Lord with their better or less good faith, each finding in the Lord his own Judge and Saviour. They cannot exclude each other when God has accepted both and will judge their faithfulness or unfaithfulness by His mercy.”

[3] On the history of this often-quoted phrase which is erroneously attributed to St. Augustine, see James J. O’Donnell, “A Common Quotation from ‘Augustine’?” accessed at http://faculty.georgetown.edu/jod/augustine/ quote.html . He points to a reference by Philip Schaff, The History of the Christian Church, 7:650-53, where he notes that the saying originated with Peter Meiderlin, a Lutheran Theologian, who published a tractate calling for peace and unity in 1626. Richard Baxter quoted the saying in the preface of The True and Only Way of Concord of all the Christian Churches in 1679, which led to it being attributed to him.