Scandalous Grace
Luke 4:14-21[1]
It doesn’t take much to be able to see that
prejudice is alive and well in our world today. Segregation may no longer be
legal, but it still defines our world in ways that are subtle and others that
are not so subtle. As Martin Luther King, Jr. observed, racism is just as real
in other parts of the country as it ever was in the “Deep South.” If you doubt
the fact that prejudice is still alive and well, all you have to do is listen
to the political rhetoric coming not only from our country but also from other
world leaders.[2]
The sad truth is that what drives the prejudices that they promote is fear,
plain and simple. Unfortunately, there have always been those who have no
qualms about using fear to gain power.
But the really hard truth about prejudice is that
it has a way of taking root in the soil of our faith. I have heard with my own
ears a member of a Presbyterian church say that there are some people he wants
to go to hell! While I don’t think most of us would be so crass as to actually
say that, I’m afraid we may feel that way about certain people we find
offensive. At least we don’t want them going to church with us! The problem
with this is that it becomes incredibly easy to assume that those we dislike
are also outside God’s favor. We can all fall into the pattern of excluding
those we deem unworthy of God’s grace.
This may sound like a very negative way to
introduce our Gospel lesson for today. It is a message of amazing good news.
Jesus appears in the synagogue at Nazareth, his home town, and announces a
message full of hope and promise: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because
he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim
release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the
oppressed go free, to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor” (Lk. 4:18-19). It
is a wonderfully upbeat message: Jesus was announcing that in him God was going
to bring freedom and renewal to all who had been beaten down by the injustice
and cruelty of this world.[3]
It is a message that found deep resonance with the
audience at the synagogue on that day in Nazareth. I think when it says that
“The eyes of all in the synagogue were fixed on him” (Lk. 4:20) after he read
the scripture, it may be a bit of an understatement. You could probably say
that everybody in the room was sitting on the edge of their seats. It was one
of those situations in which it was so quiet you could have heard a pin drop.
They had suffered under Roman and Greek military occupation for centuries. They
had seen their land taken away by the wealthy among their own people who took
advantage of the political situation to enrich themselves. They were tired of
it and longed to be set free.
So perhaps we can understand that they totally
misconstrued what Jesus was saying, as the outcome that day at Nazareth makes
clear. They heard him promising to bring hope and freedom and renewal to them—to the people of his own home town.
The fact that later Jesus rebukes them with the proverb “Physician, heal
thyself,” indicates that he knew they were expecting him to perform miracles
for “his own kind” just as they had heard he had done for others who were
“outsiders” (Lk. 4:23). [4] It
would seem that they were more than a little put off by the fact that he had
done wonderful things for others, but hadn’t taken care of the home town crowd.
But that was where they got it all wrong. From the
very beginning of Luke’s Gospel, the Scripture makes it clear that the
marvelous events that were unfolding were not just for the “home town crowd.”
They were not even just for the Jewish people. The fact that the news of Jesus’
birth was delivered by the host of angels to shepherds, who were the lowest of
outcasts in Jewish society, already demonstrates that what God was doing was
going to break through all social barriers. And Simeon made it very clear when
Jesus was presented at the temple: he was going to be “a light for revelation
to the Gentiles and for glory to your people Israel” (Lk. 1:32).
That was the message Jesus proclaimed on that day
in the synagogue at Nazareth: the good news was for the poor—for all the poor
everywhere.[5]
Jesus made it clear that God’s “favor” was coming upon those who had been
excluded from “proper society” as outcasts.[6]
The freedom and release and renewal he said God’s Spirit had empowered him to
bring was for those who had been beaten down by the hard-hearted attitudes of
some of the very people sitting there in the audience. And when he made it
clear to them that God’s grace was for the outcasts they themselves had
excluded, it enraged them so much they tried to kill him.[7]
It is an unfortunate truth of human existence that
we like to be around people who look like us, who talk like us, who live where
we live and shop at the same stores as we do.[8]
But in the meanwhile we are very likely unaware that we are living our lives in
a closed circle. Our human tendency is to prefer to stay in that closed circle.
But the message of Jesus is one that will not let us stay there.[9]
It is good news for the outcasts of our day—the people we exclude from our
circles, whether consciously or unconsciously. It is a message that breaks down
all kinds of walls we build up to protect ourselves from “outsiders.” Because Jesus proclaimed God’s scandalous
grace, he calls us to venture outside our closed circles to put God’s good news
of freedom and release into practice for everyone, everywhere.
[1] © 2016 Alan Brehm. A sermon
delivered by Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 1/24/2016 at Hickman Presbyterian Church,
Hickman, NE.
[2] Cf. “Illiberalism: Playing with
Fear,” and “Anti-Immigrant Populism: The March of Europe’s little Trumps,” in The Economist, December 12, 2015;
accessed at http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21679792-america-and-europe-right-wing-populist-politicians-are-march-threat and http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21679855-xenophobic-parties-have-long-been-ostracised-mainstream-politicians-may-no-longer-be .
[3] Cf. Fred B. Craddock, Luke, 62: the message of Isaiah 61, the
passage Jesus read in the synagogue, is that “Christ is God’s servant who will
bring to reality the longing and hope of the poor, the oppressed, and the
imprisoned. The Christ will also usher in the amnesty, the liberation, and the
restoration associated with the proclamation of the year of Jubilee.” Cf. also Cf.
R. Alan Culpepper, “The Gospel of Luke” New
Interpreters Bible IX: 106: “Jesus’ ministry signaled that the time for the
liberation of the impoverished and oppressed had come, and in that respect at
least his work would fulfill the ideal and the social concern of the Jubilee
year.”
[4] Cf. Craddock, Luke, 62-63: The fact that Jesus quotes this proverb, along with
“no prophet is welcome in the prophet’s home town,” indicates that “Jesus
understood the people to be expecting a demonstration of his extraordinary work
reported from Capernaum.” He continues by pointing out the problem very likely
lay deeper: they were motivated by “resentment that Jesus has taken God’s favor
to others beyond Nazareth, especially Capernaum, said to have a heavy
non-Jewish population.” Cf. similarly,
Culpepper, “Gospel of Luke,” NIB
IX:106. He suggests that they were hoping to “share in the fame of the prophet
from Nazareth so that no longer would anyone be able to say (however wrongly)
that there were no prophets from Galilee (John 7:52).”
[5] Cf. Joel B. Green, The Gospel of Luke, 208: where he
insists that Jesus takes the initiative throughout this narrative: “at every
step in his address at Nazareth he asserts the universal embrace of God’s
salvific purpose.” Cf.
Culpepper, “Gospel of Luke,” NIB IX:108:
“Jesus came announcing deliverance, but it was not a national deliverance but
God’s promise of liberation for all the poor and oppressed regardless of
nationality, gender, or race.” Cf. similarly Craddock, Luke, 63.
[6] Cf. Green, Gospel of Luke, 211, where he points out that the word “poor” was
broader that simply either economically poor or spiritually poor. He says, “one’s
status in a community was not so much a function of economic realities, but
depended on a number of elements, including education, gender, family heritage,
religious purity, vocation, economics, and so on.” Therefore, he concludes that
the poor included “those who are for any number of socio-religious reasons relegated
to positions outside the boundaries of God’s people.” Cf. Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God, 128-29, 175-76; Jürgen
Moltmann, The Way of Jesus Christ,
89-90, 112-16, where he points out that what made Jesus’ offer of God’s grace
scandalous was the fact that he offered the blessings of God’s Kingdom not just
to the “righteous,” but also to “sinners.”
[7] Cf. William Willimon, “Book ‘Em,” The Christian Century (January 27,
2004), 20, where he says that in citing the examples of God’s grace through
Elijah and Elisha to those outside of Israel, Jesus “threw the book at
them.” Cf. also Craddock, Luke, 63: “That these two stories were
in their own Scriptures and quite familiar perhaps accounts in part for the
intensity of their hostility. Anger and violence are the last defense of those
who are made to face the truth of their own tradition which they have long
defended and embraced. Learning what we already know is often painfully
difficult.” He also refers to the story of Jonah, which he says “stands forever
as the dramatic embodiment of that capacity in all of us, Jew and Christian
alike, to be offended by God’s grace to all those of whom we do not approve.”
[8] Cf. Craddock, Luke, 62, where he remarks suggestively, that “Unfortunately, “The
history of the church does not, …, bear unbroken testimony to Jesus’
announcement, ‘Today this scripture has been fulfilled.’”
[9] Cf. Culpepper, “Gospel of Luke,” NIB IX: 108, where he observes, “God’s
grace is never subject to the limitations and boundaries of any nation, church,
group, or race. Those who would exclude others thereby exclude themselves.”
No comments:
Post a Comment