Getting Specific
Lev. 19:1-2, 9-18; Mt.
5:38-48[1]
Much
of our faith falls in the category of what most people would call
theoretical. For example, How do you
really prove God’s existence? How do you
explain the Trinity? Who’s ever
experienced the afterlife? But there are
other aspects of our faith that are quite specific indeed. When our faith talks about how we’re to live,
it gets down to specifics. Like
measuring the quality of our faith by how we treat the weakest members of
society. Or insisting that our words and
our actions match. Or defining the
character of our hearts by the quality of our words and deeds. When it comes to these kinds of themes, our
faith is quite specific. Maybe too
specific for our comfort levels.
Take
our lesson from the Hebrew Bible for today.
If you read Leviticus 19:1-18, you’ll find all the Ten Commandments
repeated there, except for the last one.[2] But what’s really interesting is that the
commands are more specific. Instead of
just saying “you shall not steal,” this chapter also says “you shall not deal
falsely” (19:11), “you shall not defraud your neighbor” (19:13), and
interestingly, “you shall not keep for yourself the wages of a laborer until
morning” (19:13). In other words, outright theft isn’t the only kind of
“stealing” that the command prohibits!
And when it comes to “you shall not take the name of the Lord your God
in vain,” this chapter may step on some toes.
It says, “And you shall not swear falsely by my name, profaning the name
of your God” (19:12). In other words,
the dishonesty of the people of God influences the way others think about God’s
character![3]
Talk about getting specific!
But
this interesting chapter is also where Jesus got the “second greatest command,”
“you shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Lev. 19:18). We like that command. It sounds nice. But I’m not sure we’ll like it so well after
we hear what loving your neighbor means when the Bible gets specific.[4] Loving your neighbor means that “When you
reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap to the very edges of your
field, or gather the gleanings of your harvest” (19:10). Rather, “you shall
leave them for the poor and the alien” (19:11).
Rather than using all our material wealth for ourselves, we’re to
reserve a portion to help those in need.
Loving
your neighbor also means that “You shall not revile the deaf or put a stumbling
block before the blind” (19:14).
Instead, they should be treated with dignity and given the respect due
to all human beings. Loving your
neighbor means that “You shall not go around as a slanderer among your people”
(19:16). The way of love insists that we
not talk about others in a manner that diminishes their character. Beyond that,
loving your neighbor means “You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge
against any of your people” (19:18).
This Scripture gets quite specific about the kinds of actions that “You
shall love your neighbor as yourself” covers.[5]
Again,
we might be tempted to think that Jesus and the Apostles might give us a break
when it comes to being so specific about the actions that loving your neighbor
demands of us. But I’m afraid that’s not
the case. In the context of Leviticus,
it is very likely that “loving your neighbor” meant loving fellow Jewish persons.[6] It didn’t apply to foreigners in general,
except those who sought refuge among the Jewish people. And so Jesus recites the command “you shall
love your neighbor” along with its traditional counterpart, “and hate your
enemy” (Mt. 5:43).
But
Jesus won’t stand for that. When it comes to loving your neighbor, Jesus
insists that it applies to everyone, everywhere.[7] He says to “love your enemies” (5:44). And when you do that, when you can see the
person you’ve considered an “enemy” as a “neighbor,” then the whole structure
of friend and enemy is dismantled.[8] Instead of allies and foes, we’re simply left
with human beings who are all children of God. And because they are all
children of God, they all benefit from God’s love equally. As Jesus put it, God gives the
life-sustaining gifts of sun and rain to all equally (Mt. 5:45). And if God takes such a generous approach,
then those of us who claim to be people of faith can do no less.[9]
I think that’s what Jesus
meant when he called his disciples to “Be perfect as your heavenly father is
perfect” (Mt. 5:48). It doesn’t mean that
we have to be as morally and ethically flawless as God is. That’s impossible. But what it does mean is that we are to be
constantly striving to give the same generosity to others that we’ve received
so freely from God.[10] I think that’s what it means to “love your
neighbor as yourself.” Beginning with
the Apostles, serious Christians throughout the ages have sought to discern
what that means in terms of specifics.
And we continue to follow that commitment to getting specific when we
try to live out the generosity we’ve received from God toward those around us.
[1] ©
2014 Alan Brehm. A sermon delivered by
Rev. Dr. Alan Brehm on 2/23/2014 at First Presbyerian Church of Dickinson, TX.
[2]
Although the first, “You shall have no other gods before me,” is not mentioned
specifically, it seems to me that it’s implied in the call, “I am the Lord your
God.”
[3]
Contrast Jacob Milgrom, A Continental Commentary: Leviticus,
227-28, where he argues that this identification should not be made, but rather
the Holiness Code is simply focused on “lying oaths” here.
[4]
Joel S. Kaminsky, “Loving One's (Israelite) Neighbor: Election And Commandment
In Leviticus 19,” Interpretation 62 (Apr
2008): 125: In the context of the covenant relationship, “loving one's neighbor
was not simply (and perhaps not even primarily) an affective state, but rather
an obligation to act properly towards such an individual.” Cf. Similarly, Milgrom, Leviticus, 234; and Douglas R. A. Hare, Matthew, 59.
[5] Cf.
Walter Kaiser, “The Book of Leviticus,” New
Interpreters Bible, I:1136, where he says, “To be holy is ... to imitate
God. To be holy is to roll up one’s sleeves and to join in with whatever God is
doing in the world. That is why, in this great chapter on moral holiness, the
emphasis falls on social justice.”
[6]
Kaminsky, “Loving One's (Israelite) Neighbor,” 123-24. Cf. also Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics 4.2:804. Unfortunately, he argues that this is also
true of the “love of neighbor” in the New Testament. He says it applies to “the circle of the community of Jesus
Christ gathered by the Holy Spirit.”
Even though he recognizes the fact that Jesus included “the enemy” in
Mt. 5:44-45, he says, “Even here, however, there can be no question of any
extension in principle of Christian love to a universal love of humanity.” Contrast Milgrom, Leviticus, 226, where he asks, “Are we to infer that the Israelite
is free to lay aside any of the ethical rules in dealing with him? Here is
where abstract logical reasoning leads astray. The forgotten factor is that the
H school probably had no contact with foreigners.” In other words, the fact that “love for
neighbor” was applied only to fellow Jewish persons resulted from the limited
contact the circle that developed the “Holiness Code” in Leviticus (“the H
school”) had with foreigners. But he
argues that making that a principle of ethics leads us “astray”!
[7]
Cf. Glen H. Stassen, “The Fourteen Triads Of The Sermon On The Mount (Matthew
5:21-7:12),” Journal of Biblical
Literature 122/2 (2003): 282.
[8]
Cf. Jürgen Moltmann, Ethics of Hope,
202: “We are not the enemies of our enemies; we are ‘the children of our Father
in heaven’, ... . If we do not react to enmity with enmity, we creatively make
it possible for our enemies to turn away from their enmity and to enter into
the life we share.” Cf. also Jürgen
Moltmann, A Broad Place: An Autobiography,
175: “One should not become the enemy of one’s enemy, but should liberate him
from his enmity.”
[9] Cf.
W. D. Davies and D. C. Allison, Matthew
1-7, 555-55. Contrast Kaminsky, 128,
where he distinguishes between "the perfectionist ethic found in Jesus'
Sermon on the Mount" with "the much more realistic ethic found in the
Levitical code" which "never commands one to love one's enemies, a
rather unnatural act."
[10]
Cf. Davies and Allison, Matthew 1-7, 562,
where they say, “To obey Jesus words ... is, therefore, to love utterly: no
more can be asked.” They further observe
(p. 563) that “The motivation for being ‘perfect’ in love is grounded in the
Father’s ‘perfect’ love, in his giving without measure.” See further ibid., 560, where they suggest that what actually lies behind the
“be perfect” of Mt. 5:48 is the “be holy” of Lev. 19:2.
No comments:
Post a Comment